The movie I wasn’t watching

Maybe it’s the fact that I don’t really watch very many movies that randomly results in me seeing ones from the competent-to-awful end of the quality rainbow. The Proposal certainly could have been worse, and it certainly could have been better.

Right up front I’ll say that I almost always like Sandra Bullock. I haven’t seen every movie she’s made, because some of them look perfectly terrible, and there’s not that much free time in life, but she’s a comforting presence. She’s fine here as a brittle book executive who faces deportation to Canada because she’s let her visa paperwork lapse. Because that’s what demanding executives do… put major aspects of their professional life in jeopardy because they’re so bad with details.

She tries to bully her executive assistant, Ryan Reynolds, into marrying her so she can get back on the citizenship track. It isn’t quite that simple. He wants to be a book editor, so he’s got his own set of demands, and he also wouldn’t mind a little payback for putting up with three years of her bitchery. He brings her along to a family weekend in Alaska so they can prep for the upcoming interview with the mysteriously vindictive immigration agent who suspects their motives. (The agent is played by the guy who’s really good at playing off-their-meds crazy people and mild-mannered racist conspirators on Law and Order. Updated: I should have mentioned his name; that was just lazy of me. He’s Denis O’Hare, and he’s a very accomplished actor beyond his ability to bat kook clean-up on police procedurals.)

In Alaska, we meet Reynolds’s controlling father, played by Craig T. Nelson, who wants his son to give up this damned fool book editor dream and come back to Alaska to run the family empire. There’s also Reynolds’s mother, played Mary Steenburgen, looking composed and beautiful and just slightly quirky enough to keep you alert, which is what you hire Mary Steenburgen to do, because there’s really nobody better at it. And… sigh… there’s Betty White, forced to move through a bunch of “rapping granny” set pieces where old people are portrayed as being hilarious because they don’t sit in chairs and talk sentimentally about “the war.” I love Betty White, don’t get me wrong, but the nicest thing I can say about her character here is that she looks younger than her son. Props to Nelson for not succumbing to a Botox-addicted culture of youth, but wow, dude looks rough.

Here’s why the movie is just kind of competent for me. It feels like it was originally written to be about a woman and her gay male assistant concocting a sham marriage instead of a woman and her straight male assistant falling in unlikely love. It doesn’t seem like anyone made much effort to shift the narrative from straight-gay frenemy picture to opposites-attract romance. I have no idea if this actually happened, but that’s how it reads on screen, particularly Reynolds’s relationship with his parents. He resents his father for not supporting who he is, and his mother is angry at her husband’s inflexibility for necessitating so much distance from their son.

I’m not really sure what to make of Reynolds. Lots of reviews talked about the great chemistry he and Bullock had in this movie, and I didn’t really see it. They were amiable enough together, but Bullock can muster chemistry with just about anyone. Also, Reynolds’s eyes are kind of strange in that emotion doesn’t seem to reach them all the time. They’re a little dead. On an unrelated but gross note, there’s a line at the end where some background character urges Reynolds to “show [Bullock] who’s boss,” which almost manages to undo the fact that the rest of the movie didn’t totally degrade Bullock’s character for being a competent if aggressive professional.

As everyone knows, he’ll be playing Green Lantern in a big action movie. I don’t really have an opinion about this, because super-hero movies are almost always boring, and I’ve never had much interest in Green Lantern to begin with, unless we’re talking about the dive-y, bear-friendly bar in Washington, D.C. Speaking of Green Lantern’s trip to cinemas, I think that’s pretty much one of the big two accomplishments of DC’s Diane Nelson, which is among the big comic stories Tom Spurgeon identifies for the next few months. Well, that and hacking away at DC’s imprints and product variety, but that’s a topic for another day.

5 Responses to The movie I wasn’t watching

  1. JTabon says:

    Heh. The missus (not-quite-fanatic for Ryan Reynolds) made me watch this not long ago. What pretty much killed it for me was they set the bar too high in the beginning– Bullock’s character came off as such a monstrous bitch in the first 10-15 minutes that entire redemptive arc she went through was implausible for me.

    I imagine hearing my wife squeal like a schoolgirl every time Reynolds took his shirt off did not quite endear the film to me either. <_<

  2. Robin B. says:

    I found this to be very sub-par Sandra Bullock. Give me Two Weeks Notice any day.

    The romance fell absolutely flat for me, and I don’t really need much from my goofy romantic comedies. But she was too mean, and he was too…blah.

    As for Ryan Reynolds, he is certainly hot, I grant you. But I’d pick Definitely, Maybe as his more appealing rom-con role.

    • davidpwelsh says:

      “Give me Two Weeks Notice any day.”

      Quite. Or “While You Were Sleeping,” if you’re feeling old school.

      Haven’t seen “Definitely, Maybe” yet, but I’ll check and see if it’s on the “immediate gratification” tier. It doesn’t have Aniston in it, does it?

  3. TempestDash says:

    I have to agree about the story seemingly meant to be a buddy film instead of a romance. Reynolds falling for Bullock in the end seemed very awkward to me and, yeah, it’s hard to see emotion on his face.

    I think the biggest problem is that Reynolds’ character arc and Bullock’s character arc were on different trajectories. Reynolds was tormenting his boss, yes, but his problem had to do with his father and his perceived destiny. Bullock’s arc was more about finding depth in her personal life which would include connecting to another person on a deeper level. This could have worked with a friendship angle, but the romance comes off lopsided because Reynolds had other things on his plate.

    • davidpwelsh says:

      Exactly! I can’t even call their storylines parallel so much as just… concurrent. They were happening at the same time, but there was nothing resonant about them side by side. And ideally, they should be congruent. (Romantic storytelling really is geometry.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 57 other followers

%d bloggers like this: